Motorsport UK chairman David Richards has threatened to take authorized motion in opposition to the FIA until it addresses what he referred to as an “erosion of accountability” below president Mohammed Ben Sulayem’s management.
Writing an tackle to Motorsport UK members, Richards – who was lately prevented from attending a World Motor Sport Council meeting after refusing to sign a non-disclosure agreement – highlighted “considerations concerning the good governance throughout the FIA”.
In a lengthly missive, Richards explained his decision to initially back Ben Sulayem’s election marketing campaign solely to then define how there had been “a definite failure” to satisfy “guarantees” of full transparency.
He wrote: “For a while now, I’ve had considerations concerning the erosion of accountability and good governance throughout the FIA.
“As you could have seen within the press, a difficulty has lately emerged that has compelled me to take a stand and desires a proof.
“Initially, let me flip the clock again to slightly over three years in the past once we, alongside the Royal Vehicle Membership, supported Mohammed Ben Sulayem in his bid to turn out to be the following president of the FIA.
“A lot of you have been presumably stunned that we did not assist the British candidate, Graham Stoker, however the [Motorsport UK] board met with each candidate groups and was satisfied by the effectively thought out plans that Mohammed’s marketing campaign staff offered, which very a lot aligned with our personal views of the way in which the FIA ought to remodel itself.
“The important thing messages of their presentation have been: A hands-off president who could be non-executive and delegate the day-to-day operating of the FlA to knowledgeable govt staff.
“The appointment of an empowered and succesful CEO to run the FIA to skilled requirements.
“Full transparency of actions and the very best requirements of sporting governance.”
David Richards and Mohammed Ben Sulayem, President, FIA
Photograph by: Mark Sutton / Motorsport Photos
Richards defined how he feels Ben Sulayem had did not ship on his manifesto guarantees and can also be involved concerning the current departures from the FIA.
Ben Sulayem has additionally lately pushed through changes to the organisation’s governance structure to dilute the ethics and audit committee’s energy.
Richards added: “I am afraid that during the last three years there was a definite failure to satisfy these guarantees.
“In actual fact, the state of affairs has progressively worsened with media experiences confirming that quite a few senior members of the FIA and volunteer officers have both been fired or have resigned below an opaque cloud.
“Moreover, the scope of the audit and ethics committees has been severely restricted and now lacks autonomy from the authority of the president, whereas our UK consultant, who challenged sure issues, was summarily eliminated together with the chair of the audit committee.”
Richards defined that the FIA’s calls for to signal an NDA then prompted him to talk out.
He stated: “This has turn out to be more and more worrying and the ultimate straw for me, three weeks in the past, was being requested to signal a brand new confidentiality settlement that I considered a gagging order.
“On the time of my appointment to the World Motor Sport Council in 2021, I signed a confidentiality settlement and actually was already sure by Article 4 of the FIA Code of Ethics.
“I stay dedicated to my confidentiality obligations below this current settlement and Article 4, which stay in impact.
“Nonetheless, the brand new confidentiality settlement went far additional than this and, at per week’s discover, I used to be advised that if I did not signal it, I’d be barred from the following World Motor Sport Council.”
Richards stated the NDA meant the FIA “at its personal discretion, may resolve if anybody breached the phrases of the brand new confidentiality settlement with no course of or body of reference”.
He additionally famous that any breach triggers “an instantaneous effective of €50,000 and a menace of undisclosed damages”.
He concluded that successfully making a “gagging order on volunteer representatives shouldn’t be how a member-owned and pushed organisation ought to behave”.
Richards has now stated Motorsport UK would take authorized motion in opposition to the FIA until the problems raised are addressed.
It’s a devastating blow to Ben Sulayem’s repute in a yr the place he’s making ready for re-election.
As but, there is no such thing as a opposition, nonetheless Richards’ strongly-worded letter is extremely prone to trigger a response in a technique or one other.
On this article
Be the primary to know and subscribe for real-time information e-mail updates on these matters
Subscribe to news alerts